Being a
manager is to walk a tight rope. It’s about finding and maintaining the right
balance consistently, lest you fall and fail.
By
balance, I mean walking that fine line between over-managing people and giving
them too much leeway in their jobs. I couldn’t illustrate this better than did Danish
author Carsten Jensen in a passage in his well-crafted 2011 novel,
We, the Drowned, about generations of
seamen from the small Danish port of Marstal:
“Every
sailing ship has miles of ropes, scores of blocks, hundreds of square yards of
canvas. Unless the ropes are constantly pulled and the sails endlessly
adjusted, the ship becomes a helpless victim of the wind. Managing a crew is
the same thing.
“The
captain holds hundreds of invisible ropes in his hands. Allowing the crew to
take charge is letting the wind take the helm: the ship will be wrecked. But if
the captain takes complete control, the ship will be becalmed and go nowhere:
he strips his men of all initiative; they’ll no longer do their best and go
about their work with reluctance. It’s all a question of experience and
knowledge. But first and foremost, it’s about authority.”
Of course,
modern organizations are not 19th century sailing vessels. Plying the
vast open waters of the world’s great oceans at the mercy of fickle winds,
currents and weather, there was an ever-present danger of rogue waves, sudden
storms and typhoons, and lapses in judgment that could and often did result in disaster:
lost ships, drowned crew, and lost cargo.
While
there may be no such life-and-death dangers in today’s modern office buildings
and factory floors, the metaphor works.
Tight Reins Stifle Excellence
Managers who
keep a tight rein on their teams, who micro-manage and second-guess their employees’
every move soon create a disheartened workforce. I’ve seen these situations
first-hand.
Employees
“check out.” They go through the motions of doing their jobs, waiting for their
manager to correct them, admonish them, or figuratively reach over their
shoulders and do their jobs for them.
This
approach begs the question of such managers: why do you hire people? And
exactly what skills were you looking for when you hired them? Are your people
interchangeable? Clearly, by their actions, this sort of manager telegraphs his/her
own gross insecurity that often betrays a personal lack of confidence, an
innate craving to be superior when, in fact, that is in doubt.
Conversely,
the other extreme can be just as bad. When the manager is hands-off, offering little
or no feedback or coaching, employees are cut adrift. They are left to guess
what is expected of them, what determines excellence. In their minds, what they
do has little meaning. Their errors and mistakes may or may not bring harm to the
company, but it’s unlikely they’ll realize it until it’s too late.
The
happy middle ground is a bit of both: mentoring and coaching, nurturing and building the self-assurance
of one’s employees until they feel secure and confident in their own
abilities. They eventually gain a larger understanding of the team’s challenges,
better able to make independent judgments, acquiring the wisdom that comes with
experience.
As
Jensen notes, a manager’s role is to exert authority – not by doing your team
members’ jobs for them or second-guessing every decision they make, but rather driving
them to improve their own individual performances constantly for the betterment
of the larger effort. It is coaching them to ask the right questions and to strive
for personal improvement in their individual quests for excellence.
As
a manager, it’s your responsibility to leverage your own knowledge and
experience to guide and coach your employees toward the acquisition of the same
in application to the unit’s and the business’ challenges. It is helping them make
the links between what they do every day and the organization’s larger purpose
and goals.
1 comment:
Great post, Jack. Too bad Jamie Dimon hadn't read it a few years ago.
Post a Comment